Comparative psychometric review of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised in a unionized U.S. public sector workforce

Background: Workplace violence is a global problem that includes actions collectively defined as bullying as perpetrated by a work colleague.

Purpose: Two distinct studies were conducted to assess the feasibility of using an abridged 6-item scale within the 21- item Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) designed to assess workplace bullying.

Methods: The pilot study was a psychometric review of the 21-item NAQ-R, and the main study was conducted to determine the reliability and the validity of using a 6-item version. Cronbach's alpha assessed the internal consistency of the two versions of the NAQ-R. Validity was assessed using logistic regression with theoretically related constructs with a pilot study (n = 420) using the 21-item scale, followed by the main study (n = 11,874) using the 6-item version.

Results: Both the pilot study (21-item)and the main study (6-item) versions of the NAQ-R demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.93-0.86, respectively). Similar to the 21-item, the 6-item version had a significant impact on the intent to remain on the job, being personally affected, and supported the protective role of the organizational climate against exposure to negative acts.

Conclusion: This study supports using the 6-item NAQ-R, which can reduce respondent burden and streamline data gathering and analysis.

Keywords: Bullying; measurement; negative acts questionnaire-revised; psychometrics; public sector.

Similar articles

Makarem NN, Tavitian-Elmadjian LR, Brome D, Hamadeh GN, Einarsen S. Makarem NN, et al. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 9;8(12):e024009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024009. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30530587 Free PMC article.

Tsuno K, Kawakami N, Inoue A, Abe K. Tsuno K, et al. J Occup Health. 2010;52(4):216-26. doi: 10.1539/joh.l10036. Epub 2010 Jun 21. J Occup Health. 2010. PMID: 20571253

Erwandi D, Kadir A, Lestari F. Erwandi D, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 10;18(8):3985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083985. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33920092 Free PMC article.

Difazio RL, Strout TD, Vessey JA, Lulloff A. Difazio RL, et al. Nurs Res. 2018 Jul/Aug;67(4):294-304. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000283. Nurs Res. 2018. PMID: 29953044 Free PMC article. Review.

Ribeiro ARV, Sani AI. Ribeiro ARV, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 9;21(4):459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040459. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38673370 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

Ma SC, Chou W, Chien TW, Chow JC, Yeh YT, Chou PH, Lee HF. Ma SC, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 20;8(5):e16747. doi: 10.2196/16747. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32432557 Free PMC article.

Pei KY, Hafler J, Alseidi A, Slade MD, Klingensmith M, Cochran A. Pei KY, et al. JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):524-526. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0263. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32236505 Free PMC article.

Miller P, Brook L, Stomski N, Ditchburn G, Morrison P. Miller P, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 24;15(3):e0229970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229970. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32208425 Free PMC article.